Attribute Evaluability and its Implications for Joint-Separate Evaluation Reversals and Beyond

71 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Citations in the corpus

Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences (2007, unknown): “Research shows that joint and separate evaluations can often elicit diVerent preferences (Bazerman, Loewenstein, & White, 1992; Hsee, 2000; Hsee, Loewenstein, Blount, & Bazerman, 1999; Hsee & Zhang, 2004).”
Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: (2011, unknown): “Preference reversals in joint and separate evaluations Source: Hsee (2000).”
Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences (2009, unknown): “Decision researchers have found that, in general, people are not sensitive to the duration over which events take place (e.g., Fredrickson and Kahneman 1993), and duration is difficult to evaluate in isolation in retrospective evaluation (e.g., Ariely and Loewenstein 2000; Hsee 2000).”
The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Information in Supply-Chain Contracting: Evidence from the Expansion of CSR Rating Coverage (2021, unknown): “The general evaluability theory (Hsee, 2000; Hsee and Zhang, 2010) argues that the usefulness of a (CSR) metric might be low without knowledge of the underlying value distribution of the metric (e.g., a noisy or not accessible time series of the CSR metric) or lack of a neutral reference point…”