Phylogenetic placements of ustilaginomycetous anamorphs as deduced from nuclear LSU rDNA sequences
By D. Begerow, R. Bauer, T. Boekhout. 2000
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/898f168919ed776c3f5dd0349b1f725da5298009
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- A phylogenetic hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina based on multiple gene analyses and morphological data. (2006, methodology): “As in other molecular studies (Begerow et al 1997, 2000, Bauer et al 2001b; Weiss et al 2004) the monophyly of this order is only weakly supported (FIG.”
- Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. (2000, unknown): “Begerow et al. (1999) proposed the separate order Malasseziales.”
- Phylogeny of the rust fungi: an approach using nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (2003, background): “…both sampled Ochropsora ariae specimens — one sequenced from the aecial host Anemone nemorosa, the other from the telial host Aruncus dioica — were identical in all bases, confirming the usefulness of this DNA region for determining anamorph–teliomorph relationships (e.g., Begerow et al. 2000).”
- The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi (2011, background): “Overall, the application of Phylogenetic Species Criterion supported Morphological Species Criterion in many of the genera of smut fungi (Hendrichs et al. 2005; Begerow et al. 2000; Castlebury et al. 2005) and only recently the large Ustilago / Sporisorium / Macalpinomyces species complex has been s”
- Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits. (2004, methodology): “…have appeared in analyses using nucSSU rDNA (e.g., Nishida et al., 1995; Swann and Taylor, 1995; Swann et al., 1999), but by far the most extensive sampling in this group has been performed by Begerow et al. (1997, 2000, 2002) and Piepenbring et al. (1999), who examined nucLSU rDNA.”