Dispositional empathy with nature

By Kim‐Pong Tam. 2013

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8987c0dc5651e4a2b6ccc1935e531b2182bb08cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis (2014, background): “As previously mentioned, nature connectedness consistently predicts pro-environmental attitudes and concern about the environment (Mayer and Frantz, 2004; Leary et al., 2008; Nisbet et al., 2009; Tam, 2013a).”
Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability (2019, background): “An example is the cognitive capacity to understand distress of an animal that is suffering the consequences of pollution of its habitat or the progressive deterioration of a natural environment or resources (Tam, 2013).”
Feelings for the Suffering of Others and the Environment (2016, background): “Recently, Tam (2013) proposed that empathy with suffering nature is one fundamental factor in predicting proenvironmental behavior.”
Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice (2014, background): “, inner happiness, peace-of-mind, presence-ofbeing, heightened attention and awareness, love and forgiveness, aliveness and vitality, curiosity and inquisitiveness, physical and mental resilience, generosity and gratitude, empathy and feelings of belonging, relatedness, and oneness [32, 97, 100, 101”
The Way Forward in Mindfulness and Sustainability: a Critical Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “The ability to connect with others and to extend feelings of empathy and compassion to far-away communities and nun-human life is therefore assumed to be an important predictor for more ecological lifestyles (Tam 2013; Pfattheicher et al. 2016).”
Empathy for Animals: A Review of the Existing Literature (2018, background): “© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1 Frantz 2004; Myers et al. 2009; Nisbet et al. 2009; Schultz 2000; Schultz and Tabanico 2007; Tam 2013).”
Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective (2017, methodology): “Although the CNS scale is arguably the most popular measure of environmental identity among researchers, several other relevant tools have been proposed in the literature in the past ten years as well (see Tam, 2013a for a review).”
Employee workplace spirituality and pro-environmental behavior in the hotel industry (2018, background): “In previous studies, scholars have considered connectedness to nature as a mediator between anthropomorphism and PEB by relying on the logic that anthropomorphism enhances the social connection with nature and highlights the similarity between humans and nature (Tam, 2013).”
Effect of frequency and mode of contact with nature on children's self-reported ecological behaviors (2015, background): “Above mentioned researchers and several others (Chawla & Cushing, 2007; Hartig et al., 2007; Hinds & Sparks, 2008; Mayer & Frantz, 2004; Tam, 2013) agree that contact with nature brings positive, pleasant experiences to people and that it should be encouraged as a way of enhancing pro-environmentali”