Curbing global meat consumption: Emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition
By L. Vranken, T. Avermaete, Dimitrios Petalios, E. Mathijs. 2014
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89709162c2f94e21888abd9866f3ae4e19d7d3bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Economics and Econometrics
- V. Réquillart
- Z. Bouamra‐Mechemache
- Nicolas Treich
- Céline Bonnet
- K. Grunert
- Stergios Athanassoglou
- Anastasios Xepapadeas
Citations in the corpus
- Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions (2017, unknown): “…either: An inflection point in meat consumption has been identified for annual incomes around 36,000 USD (Cole and McCoskey 2013) or ranging between 35,000–53,000 USD per capita (Vranken et al. 2014), against a global GDP cap-1 ranging around 10,000 USD in 2015, expressed in constant 2010 USD.”
- Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions (2019, background): “13 certain point onwards higher levels of income in more developed countries were associated with lower levels of meat consumption (Vranken et al., 2014).”
- Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare (2020, background): “The public generally displays a low level of awareness as to the negative impacts of meat production (Wellesley et al., 2015), and may form self-serving beliefs in order to reduce the feeling of guilt associated with the death and the suffering of farm animals (Loughnan et al.”