The Ethics of Development: From Economism to Human Development

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Subjective and Objective Well-Being in Relation to Economic Inputs: Puzzles and Responses (2005, background): “A possible implication arises from this combination of a remarkable gap and questionable substitute conceptions, as well as from the common but morally egregious aggregation of measures of individual well-being according to agents’ purchasing power (Gasper 2004b).”
Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs (2015, background): “Gasper (2005) and Brock conclude that the capability approach is then derivative of the need approach.”
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, background): “…studies and development ethics that builds on the capability approach, see Alkire (2002); Clark (2002, 2005); Conradie (2013); Crocker (2008); Deneulin (2006a, 2006b, 2014); Drydyk (2011, 2013); Gasper (2004); Ibrahim (2011); Klasen (2000); Qizilbash (1996) and Qizilbash and Clark (2005).”
The Interplay of Well-being and Resilience in Applying a Social-Ecological Perspective (2012, background): “In social psychology, well-being reflects a shift from treating psychological problems to examining the conditions for human flourishing (Ryan and Deci 2001, Gasper 2004).”
Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress (2011, background): “Gasper (2004) can be consulted for an extensive review of these conceptualizations.”