Subjective and Objective Well-Being in Relation to Economic Inputs: Puzzles and Responses

By D. Gasper. 2005

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fbb083694a19ceec75b9018634335856848e58b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. W. Lamb
2. J. Steinberger
3. Vegard Tveito
4. I. Gough
5. Fulvio Castellacci
6. Mariana Mazzucato
7. Teofil Ciobanu
8. Carlos Martín-Ríos

In Social Psychology

1. J. Steinberger
2. W. Lamb
3. Vegard Tveito
4. I. Gough
5. Fulvio Castellacci

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Steinberger
2. Vegard Tveito
3. I. Gough
4. Fulvio Castellacci
5. W. Lamb

Citations in the corpus

• Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs (2015, background): “Gasper (2005) and Brock conclude that the capability approach is then derivative of the need approach.”
• Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework (2018, background): “The second research tradition comprises different strands of research which have in common the focus on a set of characteristics that are regarded as necessary for individuals to lead a good life, and how these “objective” characteristics can be empirically measured (Gasper, 2005; Guillen-Royo, 2009”
• Human well‐being and climate change mitigation (2017, background): “Yet these differing approaches can also be seen as complementary, capturing different aspects of a well-being concept that cannot be reduced to a single disciplinary paradigm.(5) Subjective wellbeing research is primarily descriptive, an evaluation of people’s self-observed state-of-being; whereas e”