Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model.

By Rachel A. Diana, Andrew P. Yonelinas, Charan Ranganath. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007

1,166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/895cdff70209cc0987bf493c80ed410aba9446b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Flexible Memories: Differential Roles for Medial Temporal Lobe and Prefrontal Cortex in Cross-Episode Binding (2010, background): “…suggest that the PHC supports encoding and recollection of contextual (both spatial and nonspatial) information associated with specific items, whereas the hippocampus binds those items to context information within individual events (Davachi, 2006; Diana et al., 2007; Eichenbaum et al., 2007).”
Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: A meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies (2011, methodology): “Additionally, a reference list check of recent neuroimaging memory study reviews (Diana et al., 2007; Spaniol et al., 2009; Uncapher and Wagner, 2009) was done to identify relevant studies not found by the online database search.”
Memory search and the neural representation of context. (2008, background): “Another possibility is 237 that slowly evolving neural representations in PFC directly serve as internal context, and the rep238 resentations resident in PFC and posterior cortex both project into hippocampus, where they are 239 associated with one another [65].”
The molecular and systems biology of memory. (2014, positive): “However, various models share the view that the hippocampus combines information from medial temporal lobe cortices to support binding of multiple stimulus attributes (Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Diana et al., 2007; Wixted and Squire, 2011).”
Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. (2008, background): “Indeed, according to the ‘‘Binding of Items and Contexts’’ (BIC) model (Diana et al., 2007), PRc activity during retrieval can be correlated with recollection in response to a partial cue.”
The restless engram: consolidations never end. (2012, background): “However, various models share the view that the hippocampus combines information from medial temporal lobe cortices to support binding of multiple stimulus attributes (Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Diana et al., 2007; Wixted and Squire, 2011).”
Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? (2009, background): “Whether this joint activity at encoding results in the kinds of unitized representations discussed by Diana et al. (2007) as leading to a familiarity response at test is an interesting question.”
Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation. (2009, background): “…proper to include the arahippocampal gyrus provides additional evidence that parahipocampal structures (perirhinal, entorhinal, and parahippocampal ortices) make a significant contribution to memory (for recent eviews, see Diana et al., 2007; Eichenbaum et al., 2007; see also owles et al., 2007).”
Brain Networks Underlying Episodic Memory Retrieval (2012, positive): “It has been proposed that the hippocampus acts in concert with the parahippocampal and perirhinal cortices to support recollection, with the hippocampus ‘binding’ contextual information from the parahippocampal cortex with object information from the perirhinal cortex to form an integrated episodic ”
Neural reactivation in parietal cortex enhances memory for episodically linked information (2018, background): “If the testing effect and/or RIFA result from reactivation of episodic context, we might expect retrieval practice to reactivate representations in the hippocampus, which supports binding of item and context information (13, 14).”
Post-learning hippocampal dynamics promote preferential retention of rewarding events (2016, methodology): “The behavioral findings demonstrate a reliable memory advantage for items learned in rewarding contexts.”
Are episodic memories special? On the sameness of remembered and imagined event simulation (2018, background): “…ideas have been proposed by others; for instance, Graham et al. (2010) argued that the hippocampus creates complex conjunctions of scenes, objects and self, and Diana et al. (2007) suggest that the hippocampus binds items with contexts to create ‘situation models’ (i.e. simulations of events).”