Government and control

By Nikolas Rose. 2000

1,101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/895a05c2fa006a47978b9efd316edafe5a88f683

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject (2005, background): “…as a risky population to be efficiently and prudently managed by the state, as well as by citizens and a host of non-state agencies (Simon, 1993; O’Malley, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000; Rose, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002; Ericson and Haggerty, 1997, 2002; Stenson and Sullivan, 2001; Ericson and Doyle, 2003).”
Sport and Development (2011, background): “relationships between the state and the individual became less those in which a socially minded government provided for the welfare of its citizens to one in which citizens were expected to actively self-govern and self-regulate through moral prudence and responsibility (Rose, 2000).”
A New Algorithmic Identity (2011, background): “…of this article I will understand control as ‘operating through conditional access to circuits of consumption and civility’, interpreting control’s mark on subjects as a guiding mechanism that opens and closes particular conditions of possibility that users can encounter (Rose, 2000: 326).”
Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression (2014, background): “…where the protagonist’s gender remains constant but her race and class vary still require her to be ‘prudent, responsible for [her] own destin[y], actively calculating about [her] future[] and providing for [her] own security’ (Rose, 2000: 324), only the rationale for her responsibilization varies.”
Going to Prison: A Prison Visitation Program (2005, background): “…rigorous studies exist on the perceptions of the public or lawmakers regarding the provision of such luxuries or amenities to prison inmates, the limited research available does, as is common with criminal justice policies and perceptions, suggest ambivalence (see O’Malley, 1999; Rose, 2000).”
“Getting Gut-Level” (2008, background): “The subjectivity that WTS’s therapeutic technologies aimed to produce was not the responsible, self-controlled, degendered subject (Garland 1997; Rose 2000), but an emotional, introspective, liberated woman.”
THE POLITICS OF RISK AND YOUNG OFFENDERS' EXPERIENCES OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (2005, background): “Recent decades have witnessed significant changes in the modes of governance of social, political and economic relations in advanced liberal societies (Rose 2000).”