Media Exposure, Public Policy Pressure, and Environmental Disclosure: An Examination of the Impact of Tri Data Availability

By Dennis M. Patten. 2002

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89116ed98dfda79a967bb55f53922338c6926c7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Stergios Leventis
2. Carmelo Reverte
3. C. de Villiers
4. Ronald P. Guidry
5. Jonathan H. Grenier
6. Petros Vourvachis
7. T. Woodward
8. M. Freedman

In Marketing

1. Ronald P. Guidry
2. Carmelo Reverte
3. C. de Villiers
4. M. Freedman
5. Petros Vourvachis
6. T. Woodward
7. Jonathan H. Grenier
8. Ryan Casey

In Strategy and Management

1. Ronald P. Guidry
2. Carmelo Reverte
3. C. de Villiers
4. M. Freedman
5. Jonathan H. Grenier
6. Petros Vourvachis
7. T. Woodward
8. Ryan Casey

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in U.S. banks (2014, background): “Entities enjoy legitimacy insofar as they demonstrate that their activities are congruent ith broad societal acceptations (Castello & Lozano, 2011; Dawkins & Fraas, 2011; Patten, 2002; Woodward, Edwards, & irkin, 1996).”
• Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure (2004, background): “Deegan and Rankin (1996)and Patten (2000, 2002)all suggest companies use environmental disclosure as a manipulative device rather than as a tool for full disclosure of actual performance.”
• The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors (2010, unknown): “…(1985), Freedman and Wasley (1990), and Fekrat, Inclan and Petroni (1996) do not find a significant association between environmental disclosure (in the annual report or in the 10K report) and the CEP index of environmental performance while Patten (2002a) establishes a negative relationship.”
• Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms (2009, background): “…to be importantly and systematically determined by a variety of firm and industry characteristics that influence the relative costs and benefits of disclosing such information (Belkaoui and Karpik, 1989; Cormier and Magnan, 2003; Cormier et al., 2005; Hackston and Milne, 1996; Patten, 2002a, b).”
• The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting (2014, background): “Media attention specifically influences CSRR content, as shown by Ader (1995), Brown and Deegan (1998), and Patten (2002).”
• Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges (2015, background): “For example often the relation of disclo ure with economic (Belkaoui and Karpik, 1989) and environmental performance (Ingram nd Frazier, 1980; Buhr, 1998; Patten, 2002b) is sought to be examined with the findings being inconclusive.”
• Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research (2012, background): “These strong findings for a firm size relation are not unexpected given substantial prior research documenting a similar association (for a summary, see, e.g., Deegan, 2002; Patten, 2002b).”