What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural weed? The case of invasive American species in France

By Maillet, López-García. 2000

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8900b192202deca87f35d27ad931fb884dbfac77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

A Comparison of Plastic Responses to Competition by Invasive and Non-invasive Congeners in the Commelinaceae (2006, background): “Studies that have examined only plasticity in measures of performance have typically found that invasive species have greater performance plasticity than natives (Baruch and Bilbao 1999; Simoes and Baruch 1991; Maillet and Lopez-Garcia 2000; Kolb and Alpert 2003; Leger and Rice 2003; Burns 2004).”
A comparison of invasive and non‐invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients (2004, background): “Other studies have found that invasive species had higher biomass than non-invasive species at high nutrient availabilities and that invasive and non-invasive species did not differ at low nutrient availabilities (e.g. Maillet & Lopez-Garcia, 2000; Kolb & Alpert, 2003).”
Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and noninvasive exotic species grown at four irradiance levels (2007, background): “The results suggested that other traits (such as good irradiance acclimation) besides resources capture-related traits may also confer competitive advantage to the invaders (Maillet and Lopez-Garcia, 2000; Smith and Knapp, 2001).”
A Characterization of the Non-indigenous Flora of the Azores Archipelago (2004, background): “The families with highest absolute contributions are those usually cited in other regions, namely Asteraceae, Poaceae, Amaranthaceae and Euphorbiaceae (Maillet and Lopez-Garcia 2000).”
Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential (2008, background): “…(designed to assess future risk, and including assessment of environmental or economic consequences; NRC, 2002), but also schemes that associate species attributes with past establishment or invasive success, regardless of consequences (e.g. Marchetti et al ., 2004; Richardson & Rejmánek, 2004).”
The historical spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in France from herbarium records (2006, background): “In spite of the many studies that have been carried out, it is still hard to predict the invasive success of these species (Maillet & Lopez-Garcia, 2000).”
Early bird catches the worm: germination as a critical step in plant invasion (2016, background): “…species, ideally congeners, in their non-native distribution range is useful to identify traits that explain the success of species that have become invasive in novel environments compared to those that have not (Maillet and Lopez-Garcia 2000; Hamilton et al. 2005; van Kleunen et al. 2010).”