Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness.

By Adam A. K. Anderson. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2005

685 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88fd28fd987011896daf7cbc0457f2bdf33718b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Mara Mather
2. Matthew R. Sutherland
3. David Sander
4. Tobias Brosch
5. David H. Zald
6. Gilles Pourtois
7. Josh M. Cisler
8. J. V. Bavel

In Sensory Systems

1. Mara Mather
2. Deborah Talmi
3. M. Kindt
4. Elizabeth A. Phelps
5. Karen M. Arnell
6. Josh M. Cisler
7. Lucy M. McGarry
8. Matthew R. Sutherland

Citations in the corpus

• The perception and categorisation of emotional stimuli: A review (2010, background): “For example, studies investigating the attentional blink have found rapid attentional prioritisation of both emotional words (Anderson, 2005) and emotional pictures (Most et al.”
• The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, background): “In this section we examine a more basic psychological property pertaining to moralized content that can help explain why it spreads online: Our perceptual systems may be naturally tuned to detect stimuli that are associated with morality and emotion (see Anderson, 2005; Gantman & Van Bavel, 2015).”
• When emotional valence modulates audiovisual integration (2012, neutral): “For instance, the attentional blink tends to be reduced for aversive emotional stimuli: That is, the second target in a rapidly presented series of stimuli is masked to a lesser extent by a preceding target when the second target is emotionally relevant (as compared to emotionally neutral; Anderson,”
• Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP (2007, methodology): “Anderson (2005) and Keil and Ihssen (2004) have recently shown that the AB of participants is dramatically reduced when T2 is an emotionally arousing word, suggesting that such words receive preferential attentional processing in RSVP.”
• Emotional arousal does not enhance association-memory (2012, background): “A subset of 64 taboo words from Anderson (2005) was chosen, non-overlapping with any words from Experiment 1 (see Appendix B).”
• The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception (2007, background): “negative) or specific threat features in the emotional modulation of attention (Anderson, 2005; Schimmack, 2005; Schupp, Junghofer, Weike, & Hamm, 2004).”
• Individual Differences in Heart Rate Variability Predict the Degree of Slowing during Response Inhibition and Initiation in the Presence of Emotional Stimuli (2011, positive): “In particular, emotional stimuli seem to attract and withhold attention longer compared to non-emotional stimuli (Öhman et al., 2001; Anderson, 2005).”
• Emotion and cognition: insights from studies of the human amygdala. (2006, background): “For some paradigms, it appears arousal is the key component for the facilitation of attention (Anderson 2005), and for others the effects appear to be specific for negative or threatening stimuli (Ohman et al. 2001).”
• Mechanisms of Attentional Biases towards Threat in the Anxiety Disorders: An Integrative Review (2009, background): “…demonstrated difficulties disengaging attention from rapidly presented emotional faces (i.e., 100 ms) during a rapid serial visual presentation task (see Anderson, 2005; Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992), whereas individuals with good attentional control displayed no disengagement difficulties.”
• Accounting for immediate emotional memory enhancement (2012, background): “It is also evident in longer latency to respond to emotional stimuli in a variety of paradigms where a neutral goal competes with the processing of emotional stimuli, such as reading, lexical decision, dot-probe and Stroop tasks (Algom, Chajut, & Lev, 2004; Anderson, 2005; Hadley & Mackay, 2006; Mac”
• Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory (2011, positive): “As in previous studies (Anderson & Phelps, 2001; De Martino, Kalisch, Rees, & Dolan, 2009), participants were less likely to show an attentional blink (inability to detect the second target) when the second target was arousing than when it was not, even though in this study, the arousing stimuli wer”