Differential Sparse Coding
By David M. Bradley, J. Bagnell. 2008
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Yann LeCun
- Jean Ponce
- Julien Mairal
- Francis R. Bach
- Thomas S. Huang
- Karol Gregor
- Jianchao Yang
- Qi Tian
Citations in the corpus
- Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks (2014, methodology): “…for efficient generation of samples from the approximate posterior can also be seen as a probabilistic generalization of the approximate feed-forward inference methods developed for sparse coding models in the last few years (Kavukcuoglu et al., 2008; Bradley & Bagnell, 2008; Gregor & LeCun, 2010).”
- Knowledge Transfer in Deep Block-Modular Neural Networks (2015, methodology): “measure was evaluated using the KL divergence [4]:”
- Sparse Modeling for Image and Vision Processing (2014, background): “For classification tasks, it is unfortunately often desirable to have stable representations, and thus improving this aspect may be important [Bruna and Mallat, 2013]. Several strategies have been proposed to deal with such an issue: • promoting incoherent dictionaries: when D⊤D is close to the iden”
- Image classification by non-negative sparse coding, low-rank and sparse decomposition (2011, background): “, image restoration [5] and classification tasks [6-11].”
- Supervised translation-invariant sparse coding (2010, methodology): “Recent research on dictionary learning for sparse coding has been targeted at learning discriminant sparse models [16, 4] instead of the purely reconstructive ones.”