Supervised translation-invariant sparse coding
By Jianchao Yang, Kai Yu, Thomas S. Huang. 2010
379 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Lei Zhang
- Xiangchu Feng
- David Dapeng Zhang
- Julien Mairal
- Francis R. Bach
- Jean Ponce
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Meng Yang
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Dacheng Tao
- Lei Zhang
- Xiaogang Wang
- Andrew Zisserman
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Image Representations by Measuring Their Equivariance and Equivalence (2014, background): “2004; Sivic andZisserman 2003), sparse (Yang et al. 2010) and local coding (Wang et al.”
- Visualizing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using Natural Pre-images (2015, background): “2004; Sivic and Zisserman 2003), sparse (Yang et al. 2010) and local coding (Wang et al.”
- Augmenting Supervised Neural Networks with Unsupervised Objectives for Large-scale Image Classification (2016, background): “Yang et al. (2010) extended this supervised sparse coding with max-pooling to obtain translation-invariant local features.”
- Efficient Algorithms for Convolutional Sparse Representations (2016, background): “The most frequent application area within this stream has been image classification [11], [12], [14], [15], [17] and detection [11], [16] tasks, but segmentation in biological imagery has also been considered [19], and image denoising has received very brief attention [14].”
- LRBM: A Restricted Boltzmann Machine Based Approach for Representation Learning on Linked Data (2014, methodology): “SSC and ICA have worse performance on SocialE while achieve relatively better performance on Robot.”
- Image classification by non-negative sparse coding, low-rank and sparse decomposition (2011, methodology): “Linear SVM classifier is then used to predict the category of images due to its advantages in speed and good performance for the sparse coding parameters [4, 11, 16, 28].”
- Top-down visual saliency via joint CRF and dictionary learning (2012, methodology): “Unlike [28] that uses max pooling to resolve geometric ambiguity, we use CRF to regulate the patches within their local contexts for learning salient visual words in complex scenes.”
- Sparse Modeling for Image and Vision Processing (2014, methodology): “…leading to state-of-the-art results for image inpainting and demosaicking [Mairal et al., 2008c, 2009], super-resolution and deblurring [Yang et al., 2010a, 2012a, Couzinie-Devy et al., 2011, Dong et al., 2011b, Zeyde et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012], face compression [Bryt and Elad,…”
- Fisher Discrimination Dictionary Learning for sparse representation (2011, methodology): “Recently sparse representation techniques have also led to promising results in image classification, e.g. face recognition (FR) [5] [6] [7] [10] [31], digit and texture classification [8] [9] [11] [12], etc.”
- Toward a Practical Face Recognition System: Robust Alignment and Illumination by Sparse Representation (2012, background): “With the same training and testing sets, [35] is able to handle the remaining misalignment and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the CMU Multi-PIE database.”
- Building a better probabilistic model of images by factorization (2011, background): “In particular, sparse coding models have been shown to yield features that match the properties of neurons in the visual cortex and also yield improved performance at image analysis and classification tasks [38, 1, 39, 16, 30, 19, 18, 28, 26].”
- The devil is in the details: an evaluation of recent feature encoding methods (2011, background): “Papers have flourished [17, 23, 24, 25, 27], and some have reported very good results on challenging benchmarks such as the PASCAL VOC classification challenge [5].”