Mixed forests reconsidered: A forest economics contribution on an ecological concept
By Thomas Knoke, B. Stimm, Christian Ammer, M. Moog. 2005
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88b0327bd2e1bd8c8f915c17cb59b6e18d853909
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
- Thomas Knoke
- Johannes Wurm
- Christian Ammer
- B. Stimm
- B. Poulter
- Sylvain Delzon
- N. E. Zimmermann
- Achilleas Psomas
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Thomas Knoke
- Johannes Wurm
- Christian Ammer
- Achilleas Psomas
- B. Stimm
- Sylvain Delzon
- N. E. Zimmermann
- M. Löf
Citations in the corpus
- Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries – a review on current and future opportunities (2016, background): “Mixed forests may be a better option than monocultures to meet multiple land use objectives (Knoke et al. 2005).”
- The optimal tree species composition for a private forest enterprise – applying the theory of portfolio selection (2013, methodology): “The theory of portfolio selection by Markowitz (1952) allows us to quantify these effects by considering tree species as financial assets (Knoke & Hahn, 2007; Knoke & Seifert, 2008; Beinhofer et al., 2009; Knoke et al., 2005).”
- Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics (2008, methodology): “While adopting the NPV and possible standard deviation from Möhring (2004), information on risk correlation was obtained from the study of Knoke et al. (2005).”
- Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? (2014, background): “Despite their higher sensitivity to some disturbance agents, these species are often preferred by forest managers as they offer higher economic value compared to ecologically more suitable species (Knoke et al., 2005).”
- Mixed forests and a flexible harvest policy: a problem for conventional risk analysis? (2006, methodology): “Also Knoke et al. (2005) demonstrated that mixed forests could be an economically attractive option for risk-averse decisionmakers.”