Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics
By Thomas Knoke, Christian Ammer, B. Stimm, R. Mosandl. European Journal of Forest Research, 2008
443 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ab4dfdf845fbc3a5c11e530b47b0d6e189a5f6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of plant phylogenetic diversity on herbivory depend on herbivore specialization (2014, background): “Cost-benefit analyses are therefore needed to find the best compromise in tree species composition to improve the provision of various ecosystem services by mixed forests (Knoke et al. 2007).”
- Mixture reduces climate sensitivity of Douglas-fir stem growth (2016, background): “In this context species mixing seems to be an effective way to stabilize forests against such impacts (Kelty, 1992; Knoke et al., 2008; Lüpke, 2004).”
- Growing Plantation Forests (2010, background): “Wind storms can cause disastrous damage to plantations, whether thinned or not (Cremer et al. 1977; Somerville 1981; Liegel 1984; Neil and Barrance 1987; Bunce and McLean 1990; Everham 1995; Foster and Boose 1995; Studholme 1995; Knoke et al. 2008; Moore et al. 2013).”
- Effects of stand composition and tree size on resistance and resilience to drought in sessile oak and Scots pine (2015, background): “…usually 521 present various effects of species mixtures in forests in case of biotic and abiotic disturbances, 522 whether they present benefits or drawbacks (Knoke et al., 2008; Maestre et al., 2009; Felton 523 et al., 2010; Lebourgeois et al., 2013; Perot et al., 2013; Pretzsch et al., 2013).”
- Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives (2015, background): “Although far-from-nature monocultures were of high interest in Europe in the past, today, close-to-nature mixed tree species stands are receiving more and more attention as many studies have highlighted the importance of species diversity for most forest functions and services (Knoke et al. 2008; Ja”
- Local habitat and landscape affect Ixodes ricinus tick abundances in forests on poor, sandy soils (2012, background): “The main arguments cited in favour of conversion include reduced risk by diversification, sustained soil fertility, biodiversity, and amenity (Brandtberg et al., 2000; Elsasser et al., 2010; Felton et al., 2010; Jactel and Brockerhoff, 2007; Knoke et al., 2008).”
- Toward managing mixed-species stands: from parametrization to prescription (2017, background): “…management activities have compounded increasing demands on managed forests to sustainably provide goods and services, including clean water, perpetually high levels of biodiversity, and resiliency and adaptability to the impending effects of climate change (Knoke et al. 2008, Kuuluvainen 2009).”
- Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change (2014, background): “…capacity because mixed stands are slightly more resistant to disturbance events such as drought or storms (von Lüpke and Spellmann, 1999; Schütz et al., 2006; Knoke et al., 2008; Lebourgeois et al., 2013), and more resilient once a disturbance has occurred (Brang, 2001; Jactel et al., 2009).”
- Species mixing reduces drought susceptibility of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) – Site water supply and fertility modify the mixing effect (2020, background): “…mixture of tree species, i.e. the increase in tree species diversity, has been widely proposed as an effective silvicultural tool to counteract the adverse impacts of droughts on tree growth and vitality, thereby stabilising forest ecosystems (Kelty, 1992; Lüpke et al., 2004; Knoke et al., 2008).”