Involvement of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA Ligase III in an Alternative Route for DNA Double-strand Breaks Rejoining*

By M. Audebert, B. Salles, P. Calsou. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for the maintenance of genomic integrity. In mammalian cells, the nonhomologous end-joining process that represents the predominant repair pathway relies on the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex. Nonetheless, several in vitro and in vivo results indicate that mammalian cells use more than a single end-joining mechanism. While searching for a DNA-PK-independent end-joining activity, we found that the pretreatment of DNA-PK-proficient and -deficient rodent cells with an inhibitor of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 enzyme (PARP-1) led to increased cytotoxicity of the highly efficient DNA double-strand breaking compound calicheamicin γ1. In addition, the repair kinetics of the DSBs induced by calicheamicin γ1 was delayed both in PARP-1-proficient cells pretreated with the PARP-1 inhibitor and in PARP-1-deficient cells. In order to get new insights into the mechanism of an alternative route for DSBs repair, we have established a new synapsis and end-joining two-step assay in vitro, operating on DSBs with either nuclear protein extracts or recombinant proteins. We found an end-joining activity independent of the DNA-PK/XRCC4-ligase IV complex but that actually required a novel synapsis activity of PARP-1 and the ligation activity of the XRCC1-DNA ligase III complex, proteins otherwise involved in the base excision repair pathway. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that a PARP-1-dependent DSBs end-joining activity may exist in mammalian cells. We propose that this mechanism could act as an alternative route of DSBs repair that complements the DNA-PK/XRCC4/ligase IV-dependent nonhomologous end-joining.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88933f90f4532185165e32b3b5a9458c1c91a506

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ryuji Hamamoto
  2. Yusuke Nakamura
  3. Takehiro Suzuki
  4. N. Dohmae
  5. Lianhua Piao
  6. W. Kraus
  7. Daechun Kang
  8. A. D’Andrea

In Oncology

  1. W. Kraus
  2. Rebecca Gupte
  3. Ziying Liu
  4. Ryuji Hamamoto
  5. Lianhua Piao
  6. A. D’Andrea
  7. Michael J Hendzel
  8. G. Shapiro

Citations in the corpus