A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: implications for neuropsychological models of aging.
By T. Ruffman, Julie D. Henry, Vicki Livingstone, Louise H. Phillips. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008
889 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af5095704d56f3611471a397692926dbc0a2642
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Andrew J. Calder
- William D. Marslen-Wilson
- James Benedict Rowe
- John S. Duncan
- Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
- Carol Brayne
- Tim Dalgleish
- Ruben C. Gur
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Natalie C. Ebner
- Andrew J. Calder
- William D. Marslen-Wilson
- John S. Duncan
- Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
- Tim Dalgleish
- Ruben C. Gur
- Richard N. Henson
In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Controlling for Response Biases Clarifies Sex and Age Differences in Facial Affect Recognition (2010, background): “These discrepancies appear to be most pronounced for negative emotions such as anger, fear, and sadness (Isaacowitz et al. 2007; Keightley et al. 2006; Malatesta et al. 1987; Mill et al. 2009; Moreno et al. 1993; Phillips et al. 2002; Ruffman et al. 2008; Sullivan and Ruffman 2004), though some evid”
- Sensitivity to genuine versus posed emotion specified in facial displays (2010, background): “While happy facial displays are often more recognisable than negative displays (Calder et al., 2003; Ruffman et al., 2008; Suzuki, Hoshino, & Shigemasu, 2006), the relative advantages and risks for each associated with misperceiving posed as genuine and vice versa is similar (Ekman & Rosenberg, 2005”
- The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing (2014, background): “This ability represents a potentially dynamic interaction between age-related declines in recognizing facial expressions of emotion [23,24] and age-related stability or even improvement in many aspects of emotional processing [25,26].”
- FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation (2010, background): “On the basis of findings that young and older adults differ in their ability to identify facial expressions (Ruffman et al., 2008) and that the age of the face seems to play a role in facial expression identification, we conducted a 3 (age of rater: young, middle-aged, older) 3 (age of face: young,…”
- Age effects and gaze patterns in recognising emotional expressions: An in-depth look at gaze measures and covariates (2010, neutral): “Other authors suggest that age differences in emotion recognition could be related to cognitive variables, perceptual variables, and/or personality traits (Ruffman et al., 2008).”