On the Evaluation of Economic Mobility
By P. Gottschalk, Enrico Spolaore. 2001
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/886da9cc2d74f88335cfe2ff32e950a9b6cb1f90
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Stefanie Stantcheva
- Edoardo Teso
- Stephen P. Jenkins
- Philippe VanKerm
- Gary S. Fields
- C. Larsen
- A. Alesina
- Elvire Guillaud
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stefanie Stantcheva
- C. Larsen
- Edoardo Teso
- Stephen P. Jenkins
- Philippe VanKerm
- Gary S. Fields
- A. Alesina
- François Bourguignon
Citations in the corpus
- Trends in Income Inequality, Pro-Poor Income Growth and Income Mobility (2006, methodology): “The emphasis on the joint distribution is also shared by the literature on the social welfare evaluation of multi-period income streams, in which the leading studies include Atkinson & Bourguignon (1982), Gottschalk & Spolaore (2002), and Bourguignon & Chakravarty (2003).”
- Does income mobility equalize longer-term incomes? New measures of an old concept (2010, methodology): “(1995), and Gottschalk and Spolaore (2002) and build in a measure of long-term”
- The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes (2008, background): “Referring to Gottschalk & Spolaore (2002), who compare USA and German, and Checchi, Ichino & Rustichini (1999), who compare USA and Italy, reality seems to be that the poor are more ‘trapped’ in USA than in Germany and Italy.”
- Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution (2018, background): “There are also related papers on the effects of standard redistributive policies on equality of opportunity, including Peichl et al. (2011) who focus on Europe, and Gelber and Weinzierl (2016) who study optimal policy design when parents can 4See also Gottschalk and Spolaore (2002).”
- Earnings Mobility and Measurement Error: A Pseudo‐Panel Approach (2005, unknown): “Gottschalk and Spolaore (2002) formalize this trade-o ff in a model with both aversion to inequality and aversion to unpredictability of incomes, fi nding the socially desirable level of mobility will be less than a level at which there is full reversal of ranks over time.”