Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution

By A. Alesina, Stefanie Stantcheva, Edoardo Teso. 2018

695 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ff372f5ee8f15157c8b018b998db0d75e1ee097

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Mijs
2. Ingar K. Haaland
3. Johannes Wohlfart
4. Christopher Roth
5. Xavier Gabaix

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Johannes Wohlfart
2. Christopher Roth
3. Ingar K. Haaland
4. Emmanuel Farhi
5. Xavier Gabaix
6. J. Mijs

Citations in the corpus

• Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice (2018, neutral): “(2007); Gillitzer and Prasad (2018); Alesina et al. (2018). 16Das et al. (2020) finds that reported beliefs about future macroeconomic outcomes are persistently different by socioeconomic status.”
• Optimal Taxation with Behavioral Agents (2020, background): “One motivation is that people might be overconfident about their probability of achieving high incomes, as they are optimistic about mobility in general (as in Bénabou and Ok (2001); Alesina et al. (2018)). Another might be that the top rates are very salient.(37) In the second case, we take ψ (a) =”
• Immigration and Redistribution (2018, neutral): “non-immigrant population, with numbers coming from Alesina et al. (2018). In the right panel, groups are defined by the”
• The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand (2019, background): “Scholars and politicians have been puzzled by the lack of popular concern about the rising level of income inequality across the West.”
• Designing Information Provision Experiments (2020, background): “Similarly, researchers cannot manipulate intergenerational mobility or influence the state of the macroeconomy, but it is possible to change perceptions of intergenerational mobility (Alesina et al., 2018c) or the perceived likelihood of a recession (Roth and Wohlfart, 2020).”
• Misinformation During a Pandemic (2020, neutral): “125 Allcott et al. (2020) (derived) δy Estimated fatality arrival rate among young individuals 6.354× 10−4 Ferguson et al. (2020) (derived) δo Estimated fatality arrival rate among older individuals 0.”
• Labor market concerns and support for immigration (2020, background): “We also contribute to a broader literature that tries to understand the determinants and malleability of people’s policy preferences by experimentally manipulating beliefs (Alesina et al., 2017; Cruces et al., 2013; Gilens, 2001; Karadja et al., 2016; Kuklinski et al., 2000; Kuziemko et al., 2015).”