Linear Order and Constituency
By Colin Phillips. Linguistic Inquiry, 2003
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8837a05b7cc4d5e7108a8da482f0114f2f1862be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Benjamin Bruening
- Jon Sprouse
- Fernanda Ferreira
- De Vries
- Sandra Chung
- Claudia Felser
- Simon Garrod
- Morten H. Christiansen
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Claudia Felser
- Harald Clahsen
- Simon Garrod
- N. Chater
- Fernanda Ferreira
- Martin J. Pickering
- Jon Sprouse
- Morten H. Christiansen
In Language and Linguistics
- Claudia Felser
- Bruno Galantucci
- Martin J. Pickering
- Jon Sprouse
- Simon Garrod
- Harald Clahsen
- Morten H. Christiansen
- N. Chater
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing (2004, background): “& Rayner, 1982; Ferreira & Clifton, 1986; Ferreira & Henderson, 1990), Reanalysis as a Last Resort theories and monotonic parsing theories (Fodor & Frazier, 1980; Frazier & Clifton, 1998; Gorrell, 1995; Phillips, 2003; Schneider & Phillips, 2001), Race-Based Parsing theories (Gompel, van Pickering, ”
- The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena (2007, background): “The parasitic-gap constructions discussed here are also of interest for attempts to bring together theories of grammatical knowledge and theories of real-time structure building (e.g. Bresnan 1978, Phillips 1996, 2003, Steedman 2000, Kempson et al. 2001, Kempen & Harbusch 2002).”
- Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science (2005, background): “(For more discussion of problems with the judgment-elicitation methodology, see Edelman and Christensen 2003, and a response to these points from Lasnik and Phillips 2003.)”
- On Multidominance and Linearization (2009, background): “Linearization is essentially a top–down procedure, starting at the root within each cycle.15 By contrast, the syntactic derivation is standardly thought of as bottom-up (here, I cannot discuss alternative proposals, but see, among others, Phillips 2003, Chesi 2007, and Zwart, in press).”
- Syntactic Identity in Sluicing: How Much and Why (2013, background): “As they observe, this reconceptualization reveals sprouting to be essentially the inverse of Move, and ‘‘has a particularly natural home’’ in the left-to-right, top-down structure building of Phillips (2003).”
- Language-particular syntactic rules and constraints: English locative inversion and do-support (2010, background): “Departing from standard assumptions, I assume that the derivation works top-down, as in Phillips 1996, 2003 and Richards 1999.”
- Reverse Island Effects and the Backward Search for a Licensor in Multiple Wh-Questions (2011, background): “…operations with the real-time parsing processes that must be deployed to build the structures in question (Frazier 1978; Kluender 1991; Kluender & Kutas 1993b; Phillips 1996, 2003; Fanselow & Frisch 2004; Featherston 2005; Alexopoulou & Keller 2007; Hofmeister 2007; Sprouse 2007; Wagers 2008).”
- Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “It also provides a natural account of routines, because these may be constituents within flexible categorial grammar but not traditional linguistics (e.g., He’s overtaking; Kuiper 1996; for other linguistic treatments, see Kempson et al. 2001; Phillips 2003).”
- Continuity and shallow structures in language processing (2006, background): “Existing proposals range from the idea that the internalized competence grammar is the parser (Phillips, 1996, 2003; Weinberg, 1999) to the claim that “grammar” does not exist except as a mere epiphenomenon reflecting the workings of a statistical parser (Bates & MacWhinney, 1989).”