The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena
By Colin Phillips. 2007
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecef9eabf1a7f19fbdc29b20afbda282bdad0d32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox
- Richard Futrell
- Roger Levy
- Takashi Morita
- Jon Sprouse
- Ellen F. Lau
- Colin Phillips
- M. Wagers
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Colin Phillips
- Jon Sprouse
- Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox
- Richard Futrell
- M. Wagers
- Takashi Morita
- Ellen F. Lau
- Nina Kazanina
In Language and Linguistics
- Jon Sprouse
- Masaya Yoshida
- Ellen F. Lau
- M. Lieberman
- Nina Kazanina
- Roger Levy
- Colin Phillips
- Richard Futrell
Citations in the corpus
- A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects (2012, background): “…of the wh-word (i.e. wh-in-situ: Huang 1982, Lasnik and Saito 1984), the amelioration of island effects when a second gap is added to the sentence (i.e. parasitic gaps: Engdahl 1983, Phillips 2006), and the constrained cross-linguistic variation in island effects (e.g. Rizzi 1982, Torrego 1984).”
- What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler–Gap Dependencies? (2018, background): “…positions (Ambridge and Goldberg, 2008), and with human online processing experiments, which have shown that gap expectation is attenuated during processing of areas where gaps cannot occur licitly, but does not always disap-pear entirely (Stowe, 1986; Traxler and Pickering, 1996; Phillips, 2006).”
- The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora (2007, background): “These findings clearly parallel results from previous work on filler-gap dependencies that has shown that those dependencies are parsed using an active search mechanism that posits gaps in advance of bottom-up confirmation, but does not posit gaps in positions that are excluded by island constraints”
- TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, unknown): “In analyzing correct responses only, we followed the convention of reading time analyses in previous processing studies (e.g., L1: Garnsey, Pearlmutter, Myers, & Lotocky, 1997 ; Phillips, 2006 ; L2: Dussias & Piñar, 2010 ; Juffs, 2005 ; Omaki & Schulz, 2011 ; White & Juffs, 1998 ).”