Applying the good lives and self-regulation models to sex offender treatment : a practical guide for clinicians

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending (2012, background): “mulated in terms of approach goals, rather than avoidance goals, because desistance emphasizes maintenance of non-offending rather than simply avoidance of offending (Ward & Maruna, 2007; Yates et al., 2010).”
The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “Given the level and pace of development in the analysis of self-regulation (Vohs & Baumeister, 2010) now integrated into GLM (Yates et al., 2010; Yates & Ward, 2008), motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000), and cognitive-affective processing (Mischel & Ayduk, 2004; Shoda & Mischel, 2006), there is every…”
Incorporating trauma-informed care into evidence-based sex offender treatment (2014, background): “While these skills are important, “one size fits all” approaches fail to consider the role of individual experiences and characteristics in the improvement of self-regulation (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Willis, Yates et al., 2013; Yates et al., 2010).”
The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model (2012, methodology): “…the importance of these two goals of interventions, we have been explicit about this in practice, both in the context of integration with the SRM (Yates & Ward, 2008) and in integration with the RNR and skillsbased cognitive behavioral treatment (Yates et al., 2010; Yates & Prescott, in press).”