NPI any and connected exceptive phrases

By Jon Gajewski. 2008

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8016335127e2f9c7b142cfa695f28a91ac5d7bae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Paula Menéndez-Benito
2. Luka Crnič
3. Jon Gajewski
4. Sigrid Beck
5. Gennaro Chierchia

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Paula Menéndez-Benito
2. Luka Crnič

In Language and Linguistics

1. Paula Menéndez-Benito
2. Luka Crnič
3. Jon Gajewski
4. Sigrid Beck
5. Gennaro Chierchia

Citations in the corpus

• More on Quantifiers in Comparative Clauses (2008, methodology): “In this section, we examine the predictions of M-theory and E-theory concerning DE-Qs against the backdrop of the predictions of the standard theory (von Stechow 1984, Rullmann 1995, Heim 2000).”
• Non-monotonicity in NPI licensing (2014, background): “(Gajewski 2008:73) These examples invalidate extant characterizations of NPI licensing conditions in terms of downward-entailingness, such as stated in (17), repeated below.”
• On universal Free Choice items (2010, background): “…line of analysis has proved rather fruitful in a number of other domains, such as durational phrases (Dowty 1979), existential sentences (Barwise and Cooper 1981), degree constructions (Fox and Hackl 2006), negative islands in comparatives (Gajewski 2008a), and weak islands (Abrusán 2007b, 2008).”