Changing Ideas about Reference

By Herbert H. Clark, Adrian Bangerter. 2004

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87e345f052eae95b2217b56796ddd3f7340aa3f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kees van Deemter
2. Emiel Krahmer
3. Paul Piwek
4. Emily M. Bender

In Language and Linguistics

1. Kees van Deemter
2. Emiel Krahmer
3. Emily M. Bender

Citations in the corpus

• On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜 (2021, background): “Our human understanding of coherence derives from our ability to recognize interlocutors’ beliefs [30, 31] and intentions [23, 33] within context [32].”
• 'Proximal' and 'distal' in language and cognition : Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch (2008, background): “…recast the concept of deixis in terms of intensity of indicating in order make explicit how our work fits in with recent studies into reference, in particular, the influential quantitative studies of multimodal reference by Herbert Clark and collaborators; see, e.g., Clark and Bangerter (2004).”
• Computational Generation of Referring Expressions: A Survey (2012, background): “The reader may want to consult Arnold (2008) for an overview of studies on reference choice in context, Clark and Bangerter (2004) for a discussion of studies on collaborative references, or Krahmer (2010) for a confrontation of some recent psycholinguistic findings with REG algorithms.”