Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions
By N. Harth, C. Leach, Thomas Kessler. 2013
324 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87b50db18cec8de2b1c52e09ceb65399ef021ec9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
- K. Lacasse
- Z. Leviston
- C. A. Haugestad
- M. J. Bissing-Olson
- Heesup Han
- A. D. Skauge
- S. Power
- Iain Walker
In Sociology and Political Science
- Heesup Han
- Sunghyup Sean Hyun
- K. Lacasse
- Z. Leviston
- C. A. Haugestad
- A. D. Skauge
- Susie Wang
- S. Power
Citations in the corpus
- Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt (2014, unknown): “…and guilt (Arvola et al., 2008; Bamberg, Hunecke,& Bl€obaum, 2007; Bamberg & M€oser, 2007; Carrus, Passafaro, & Bonnes, 2008; Ferguson & Branscombe, 2010; Harth et al., 2013; Kaiser, Schultz, Berenguer, Corral-Verdugo, & Tankha, 2008; Verhoef, 2005) are associated with pro-environmental behaviour.”
- Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects (2018, unknown): “While research previously provided evidence for the general effects of positive affect on PEB (Harth et al., 2013), the present research may serve as a starting point for future research investigating the processes underlying the in fl uence of affect on behavioral spillover.”
- Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive (2016, background): “…has only examined the emotions of pride or guilt induced through external feedback about a person’s overall environmental behavior (Mallett et al., 2013) or the behavior of an in-group (Ferguson & Branscombe, 2010; Harth et al., 2013; Mallett, 2012; Mallett et al., 2013; Rees et al., 2015).”
- Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change (2018, background): “Current research shows that emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt can motivate climate change action (Bamberg and Möser, 2007; Bissing-Olson et al., 2016; Ferguson and Branscombe, 2010; Harth et al., 2013; Lu and Schuldt, 2016; Mallett et al., 2013; Rees et al., 2015).”
- Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests. (2021, background): “…and is congruent with the literature on collective guilt, pro-environmental behavior, and collective action (Ferguson & Branscombe, 2010; Harth et al., 2013; Mallett, 2012; Mallett et al., 2013; Rees & Bamberg, 2014; Schmitt Jo urn al Pr e-p roo f 38 MIXED-METHODS INVESTIGATION OF…”
- Don't be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label (2016, background): “This behavioral reflection and/or environmentalist label may also boost feelings of pride, which can strengthen their environmental self-identity and instigate further proenvironmental actions (Bissing-Olson et al., 2016; Harth et al., 2013).”
- Fostering customers' pro-environmental behavior at a museum (2017, background): “Many existing studies in environmental psychology have partly or entirely utilized these items to properly evaluate individuals’ favorable and unfavorable anticipated feelings with respect to engaging in a particular pro-environmental behavior (Harth et al., 2013; Onwezen et al., 2014).”