Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

By E. D. de Bekker-Grob, M. Ryan, K. Gerard. Health Economics, 2012

1,461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87ab4dbcc01c51f0df276ab9cd59705bb1f2aada

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Inclusive innovation: an architecture for policy development (2014, background): “…exercises undertaken by the private sector in developed country contexts – for example, discrete choice experiments, behavioural economics techniques and future scenario analysis (Train 2003; de Bekker-Grob, Ryan, and Gerard 2010) – are generally not mirrored in developing country contexts.”
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide (2015, methodology): “Discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) have become a commonly used instrument in health economics and patientpreference analysis, addressing a wide range of policy questions [1, 2].”
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. (2016, neutral): “The most common type of conjoint analysis used in health economics, outcomes research, and health services research (hereafter referred to collectively as “outcomes research”) is the discrete choice experiment (DCE) [6,8].”
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018, methodology): “Information about the different econometric analysis methods and the appropriateness of these methods for different DCE applications is described in great detail in the prior reviews [6, 7, 11].”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, background): “[40] De Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K.”
From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number? (2012, methodology): “For a review of the large literature using stated preference method in health economics see de Bekker-Grob, Ryan, and Gerard (2012).”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Some SP studies have compared different risk communication approaches (e.g., Loomis and duVair 1993; Corso et al. 2001; Dekker et al. 2011). mended for new, unfamiliar, or difficult-to-quantify goods.”