Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test

By I. Prodan, Mateja Drnovšek. 2008

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87927faa96aa9868ac2a4a4161e24cbd3c379e67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants (2012, methodology): “In the specific field of academic entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial intentions have not yet received much attention (for exceptions see Obschonka, Silbereisen, & SchmittRodermund, 2010; Obschonka, Goethner, Silbereisen, & Cantner, in press; Prodan & Drnovsek, 2010).”
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research (2019, background): “Interestingly, while Prodan and Drnovsek (2010) found that academics' personal networks outside the university were related to their ESE, the presence of academic role models was not.”
Personality trait differences across types of entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review (2021, background): “Additionally, some of the studies relied on relatively narrow subsets of entrepreneurs, such as US homebrewers (Biraglia and Kadile 2017) or academics (Prodan and Drnovsek 2010), which can be differentiated from entrepreneurs in general.”
Unraveling the “passion orchestra” in academia (2016, background): “Specifically, while prior research points to the importance of researchers’ personal networks, perceived role models, academic experience and engagement in applied research (Prodan and Drnovsek, 2010), as well as attitudes, perceived control, social norms and group identification (Goethner et al.”
The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, methodology): “…matures in research-trained subjects) could be considered a fascinating research issue and has recently attracted a growing number of researchers of entrepreneurship (Goethner et al. 2012; Huyghe and Knockaert 2015; Mosey, Noke, and Binks 2012; Prodan and Drnovsek 2010; Ozgul and Kunday 2015).”
Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape (2016, background): “Other researchers have noted that entrepreneurial behavior among academic peers is closely linked with their perception of role models and is empirically measurable (Prodan and Drnovsek 2010).”