The influence of offshore windpower on demersal fish
By D. Wilhelmsson, T. Malm, M. Öhman. 2006
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/878be7a7ca551e4b781c7ce9fbb79811c1e906d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions (2017, background): “Fish and mobile invertebrates may be attracted to artificial structures as a result of the high prey densities inhabiting these structures, as well as the structural habitat they provide (Pickering and Whitmarsh, 1997; Wilhelmsson et al., 2006; Reubens et al., 2011, 2013; Krone et al., 2013; Ferrari”
- Benthic and fish aggregation inside an offshore wind farm: Which effects on the trophic web functioning? (2017, background): “…and demersal fauna as well 76 as on bentho-pelagic fish (including commercial species) in the direct proximity of wind farm foundations 77 (Wilhelmsson et al., 2006; Tougard et al., 2006; Wilhelmsson and Malm, 2008; Maar et al., 2009; Reubens et 78 al., 2011; Leonhard et al., 2011;…”
- Epibenthic colonization of concrete and steel pilings in a cold-temperate embayment: a field experiment (2009, background): “In a study by Wilhelmsson et al. (2006a), it was suggested that the mussels covering the surface of the structure oVered protection for the juvenile Wsh. Similarly, in the present study, juvenile C. rupestris were noticed to use colonies of sea squirts as a refuge.”
- The potential of offshore windfarms to act as marine protected areas – A systematic review of current evidence (2014, background): “Results of existing studies assessing fish occurrence at renewables sites reveal the extent of this relationship to appear species specific with benthic and nekto-benthic species that favour hard substrata displaying the largest increases at sites [23–26] and positive effect sizes in the meta-analys”
- Long-term effects of an offshore wind farm in the North Sea on fish communities (2015, background): “However, fish attraction to underwater constructions at OWFs has been reported for different gobiid species (Wilhelmsson et al. 2006, Andersson & Öhman 2010) and for the gadoids, such as cod Gadus © The authors 2015 · Open Access under www.int-res.com*Corresponding author: clast@fishstats.dk KEY…”
- Local effects of blue mussels around turbine foundations in an ecosystem model of Nysted off-shore wind farm, Denmark (2009, background): “Solid structures made for other purposes such as oil platforms, pier pilings, bridge pillars and turbine foundations also function as artificial reefs thereby affecting the local ecosystem in a similar way (Wilhelmsson et al., 2006; Wilhelmsson and Malm, 2008).”
- Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds (2010, background): “Wind turbine monopiles have been shown to act as both artificial reefs and FADs as they are positioned vertically in the water column, increasing the density of fish within the vicinity, although there may be consequences for community structure, species richness and diversity (Wilhelmsson et al. 20”
- Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy (2009, background): “[52] have shown that they act as fish aggregating devices at the Yttre Stengrund and Utgrunden wind farms.”