A survey of concepts of independence for imprecise probabilities

By Inés Couso, S. Moral, P. Walley. 2000

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A DEFENSE OF IMPRECISE CREDENCES IN INFERENCE AND DECISION MAKING1 (2010, unknown): “Consider what Couso et al. [2000] call an “unknown interaction” in which a believer is entirely ignorant about the manner in which two events might be correlated.”
Stochastic and epistemic uncertainty propagation in LCA (2013, methodology): “Couso et al. (2000) showed that the IRS method is a systematically conservative counterpart to the calculation with random quantities under stochastic independence (classical Monte Carlo method on cdfs).”
Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures (2003, background): “imprecise probabilities Any of several theories involving models of uncertainty that do not assume a unique underlying probability distribution, but instead correspond to a set of probability distributions (Couso et al. 2000).”
Weak and strong laws of large numbers for coherent lower previsions (2008, background): “Its lower envelope is a product of the marginal lower previsions Pk, and is usually called their strong, or type-I product; see Walley (1991, Section 9.3.5) and Couso et al. (2000).”