A DEFENSE OF IMPRECISE CREDENCES IN INFERENCE AND DECISION MAKING1

By James M. Joyce. 2010

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/583450d075b6799e0f84c78d30b0a2fbb25ab299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Richard Bradley
2. M. Drechsler

In General Decision Sciences

1. Richard Bradley
2. M. Drechsler

In Philosophy

1. Richard Bradley
2. M. Drechsler

Citations in the corpus

• Accuracy and the Laws of Credence (2016, unknown): “35This is akin to Joyce’s analogy between a single agent with imprecise credences and a committee of agents each with precise credences (Joyce, 2010a).”
• Types of Uncertainty (2014, background): “them goes back to at least Frank Knight (1921) and was defended by luminaries such as Keynes.”
• Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy (2019, unknown): “A second form is imprecise attitudes: an agent’s degrees of belief and values are represented with sets of sharp credence and utility functions (for example, Joyce 2010 ; Hare 2010 ).”