Devolution, Discretion, and the Effect of Local Political Values on TANF Sanctioning

By Richard C. Fording, Joe Soss, Sanford F. Schram. Social Service Review, 2007

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/874ab0af5cf991049e0987a762d2a9af90e8cdd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. T. Guul
2. Simon Calmar Andersen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Mark R. Umbricht
2. Justin C. Ortagus
3. F. Fernandez
4. T. Guul
5. Simon Calmar Andersen

Citations in the corpus

• Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform (2009, background): “Indeed, we have found this precise pattern of race-based disadvantage in studies of other aspects of welfare reform (Fording et al. 2007; Schram, Fording, and Soss 2008; Soss et al. 2008).”
• An Examination of the (Un)Intended Consequences of Performance Funding in Higher Education (2017, background): “Among TANF participants who received benefits for 9 consecutive months, Black clients were between 22% and 35% more likely to be sanctioned than White beneficiaries (Fording et al., 2007).”
• Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (background): “Even the "faults," such as they are, are common to the majority of survey books on Greek sculp-ture, and therefore not specifically imputable to this particular author, who often tries to express original ideas and positions of his own.”