Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)

By S. Sarin, Ashish Kumar, John A. Almeida, Y. Chawla, S. Fan, H. Garg, H. J. Silva, S. Hamid, R. Jalan, P. Komolmit and 17 more. Hepatology International, 2009

936 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Hepatology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/873ef0e121e7cbda7967ae2fcfe33c4910d7e3d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. P. Ginés
2. M. Bernardi
3. W. Laleman
4. P. Angeli
5. J. Trebicka
6. G. Garcia‐Tsao
7. P. Kamath
8. Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee

In Hepatology

1. P. Ginés
2. M. Bernardi
3. P. Angeli
4. W. Laleman
5. J. Trebicka
6. Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee
7. G. Garcia‐Tsao
8. P. Kamath

Citations in the corpus

• Acute-on chronic liver failure. (2012, background): “The first was put forward by the Asia–Pacific association for the study of liver disease [2]; ‘Acute hepatic insult”
• The Global Burden of Liver Disease: The Major Impact of China (2014, background): “The chronic liver failure/sequential organ failure assessment scores are used as a classification system to judge the prognosis of patients (possibility of mortality) and to screen for LT candidates with the most urgent need.41 In contrast, the Eastern definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure ma”
• Clinical Course of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure syndrome and effects on prognosis (2015, methodology): “Median delay between ACLF diagnosis and LT was 11 (1-28) days.”
• Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update (2019, background): “The terms “organ dysfunction” and “organ failure” need to be described more clearly based on the AARC database, used in APASL consensus [B2].”