New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation
By Henk F. Moed. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2009
465 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/873e2c595c4f7c7cb71e07f671ec7f03224e1e03
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Statistics and Probability
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases (2019, background): “They should be “accurate, sophisticated, up-to-date, combined with expert knowledge, and interpreted and used with care” (Moed, 2009, p. 13).”
- Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis (2016, background): “The main approach to evaluate research performance is paper citation analysis [60], whose main tenet is “the more often a paper becomes cited, the greater its influence on the field” [61].”
- Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review (2017, unknown): “Bibliometric analysis allows us to evaluate either the impact or influence, in quality or performance, of scientific publications through the use of a bibliometric indicators [17].”