Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies.

By A. Need, David B. Goldstein. 2009

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Fiona Cunningham
2. Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie
3. Benedict Paten
4. Garrison Erik
5. Adam M. Novak
6. Paul Flicek
7. Jordan M. Eizenga
8. Jason H. Moore

In Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

1. Charles L. Kooperberg
2. Benedict Paten

Citations in the corpus

• A standardized framework for representation of ancestry data in genomics studies, with application to the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (2018, background): “community to ensure that individuals from all backgrounds benefit from advances in the field of genomics [1, 2].”
• Generalization and Dilution of Association Results from European GWAS in Populations of Non-European Ancestry: The PAGE Study (2013, background): “The large majority of GWAS results reported to date derive from analyses in populations of European ancestry (EA) [1,2].”
• Genome graphs and the evolution of genome inference (2017, background): “For some time, researchers and ethicists have warned against the healthcare disparities that basing genomic studies on European populations could cause (Need and Goldstein 2009).”