Genome graphs and the evolution of genome inference

By Benedict Paten, Adam M. Novak, Jordan M. Eizenga, Garrison Erik. bioRxiv, 2017

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The human reference genome is part of the foundation of modern human biology, and a monumental scientific achievement. However, because it excludes a great deal of common human variation, it introduces a pervasive reference bias into the field of human genomics. To reduce this bias, it makes sense to draw on representative collections of human genomes, brought together into reference cohorts. There are a number of techniques to represent and organize data gleaned from these cohorts, many using ideas implicitly or explicitly borrowed from graph based models. Here, we survey various projects underway to build and apply these graph based structures—which we collectively refer to as genome graphs—and discuss the improvements in read mapping, variant calling, and haplotype determination that genome graphs are expected to produce.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4de101024c6bb0f02b4e1560b74048835df9c5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Adam M. Phillippy
  2. Evan E. Eichler
  3. Benedict Paten
  4. Paul Flicek
  5. Mark J. P. Chaisson
  6. Mitchell R. Vollger
  7. Karen H. Miga
  8. Jana Ebler

In Plant Science

  1. C. Ryan Campbell
  2. Evan E. Eichler
  3. David Haussler
  4. Benedict Paten
  5. Adam M. Phillippy
  6. Mark J. P. Chaisson
  7. J. Poelstra
  8. Paul Flicek

Citations in the corpus