Explanatory Preferences Shape Learning and Inference.
By Tania Lombrozo. 2016
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Gary Klein
- Shane T. Mueller
- Tania Lombrozo
- Q. Liao
- Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
- William J. Clancey
- Abigail Emrey
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Gary Klein
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Shane T. Mueller
- Q. Liao
- William J. Clancey
- Abigail Emrey
- Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
- Emily G. Liquin
In Molecular Biology
- Gary Klein
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Shane T. Mueller
- William J. Clancey
- Abigail Emrey
- Q. Liao
- Emily G. Liquin
- Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, background): “cord, 1983; McClure, 2002; McClure and Hilton, 1997, 1998; McClure, Sutton, and Hilton, 2003; Malle, 1999, 2004, 2011; Rey, 2012; Royce, 1963; Sloman, 1994; Swartout, 1987; Vasilyeva, Wilkenfeld, and Lombrozo, 2016; Vasilyeva and Lombrozo, 2015) Social Psychology One focus of explanation has been on”
- Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospects (2018, background): “Selfgenerated deductions and generalizations help learners refine their knowledge (Chi and VanLehn, 1991: Chi, et al, 1989, 1994; Chi & Van Lehn, 1991; Lombrozo, 2016; Molinaro & Garcia-Madruga, 2011; Rittle-Johnson, 2006).”
- Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics (2021, background): “Lombrozo [30] showed that explanations considered good are simple and broad.”
- A historical perspective of explainable Artificial Intelligence (2020, background): “…the criteria for a good explanation as of today is an active debate in various fields, including cognitive science, computer science, psychology, and philosophy (Confalonieri et al., 2019; Guidotti et al., 2018; Hoffman, Mueller, Klein, & Litman, 2018; Lipton, 2018; Lombrozo, 2016; Miller, 2019).”
- Explanation-seeking curiosity in childhood (2020, background): “Seeking explanations supports learning in young children [10,11], and explanations can drive subsequent exploration [12] and improve”
- Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024, unknown): “Experiments show people prefer answers and explanations that are simple 96,97 , broad 96,98,99 , reductive 100–102 and quantitative 103,104 .”
- Question-asking in childhood: A review of the literature and a framework for understanding its development (2018, background): “Furthermore, they are also able to adapt their question-asking strategy based on task characteristics, such as the information structure of a task (for example, whether or not the hypotheses being considered are equally likely), and the feedback they receive from people about their questions (Rugger”
- AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmap (2023, background): “…information. p This goal-oriented perspective resonates with studies of human explanations from cognitive science, philosophy, and psychology (Lombrozo, 2016; Miller, 2019), where it is recognized that seeking explanations and achieving understanding is often a means to an end for downstream…”