The frame of the game: Loss-framing increases dishonest behavior

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “Building on this, recent studies have also found that the size of the lie and the willingness to act dishonestly largely depend on whether lying is done to cover a loss or provide a gain (Grolleau et al., 2016; Schindler and Pfattheicher, 2017).”
Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making (2018, methodology): “However, the modified logistic regression approach can be adapted for a paradigm in which participants report the total number of “yes”-responses across multiple dice rolls instead of a dichotomous “yes”/“no”-response (Kleinlogel et al., 2018; Schindler & Pfattheicher, 2017).”
Preferences for Truth‐Telling (2016, background): “…1D2 Rauhut 2013 * 3 240 Switzerland die roll 1D6 Ruffle and Tobol 2014 * 1 156 Israel die roll 1D6 Ruffle and Tobol 2014 * 1 427 Israel die roll 1D6 Schindler and Pfattheicher 2017 * 2 300 USA coin toss 1D2 Shalvi et al. 2011 * 2 129 USA die roll 1D6 Shalvi 2012 2 178 Netherlands coin toss 20D2…”