Electromagnetic mixing formulas and applications
By A. Glisson. IEEE Antennas & Propagation Magazine, 2000
643 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8630d2b73732ce63ee15f03659c6805e06ec2e2d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Andrea Alù
- Nader Engheta
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Ari Henrik Sihvola
- Ricardo Marqués
- Jesús Martel
- Dimitrios C. Tzarouchis
- Douglas H. Werner
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Nader Engheta
- Lu Lu
- Andrea Alù
- Francisco Medina
- Jesús Martel
- Roger J. Phillips
- Francisco Mesa
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Francisco Medina
- Jesús Martel
- Roger J. Phillips
- Francisco Mesa
- Yuyao Chen
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Roberto Seu
- Lu Lu
Citations in the corpus
- Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials. (2019, methodology): “weak scattering (ε = 3), we can also estimate the effective medium permittivity using the classical Bruggeman mixing formula [15]: ∑”
- Comparative analysis of edge- and broadside- coupled split ring resonators for metamaterial design - theory and experiments (2003, methodology): “gests and allows for the use of an alternative treatment starting from the analysis of the polarizabilities of the elementary constituents of the metamaterial followed by an appropriate homogenization procedure [12].”
- Tunable Frequency Selective Surfaces and Negative-Zero-Positive Index Metamaterials Based on Liquid Crystals (2008, methodology): “ploying the Maxwell Garnet mixing rule [61], [62].”
- Polarizabilities and effective parameters for collections of spherical nanoparticles formed by pairs of concentric double-negative, single-negative, and∕or double-positive metamaterial layers (2004, methodology): “where ε is the effective permittivity of the homogeneous sphere [41].”
- North polar deposits of Mars: Extreme purity of the water ice (2009, methodology): “In this range of e (3.0 to 3.2), the impurity rate corresponding to a 10% variation of e can be computed by applying the MaxwellGarnett formula [Sihvola, 1999]: eeff ¼ ee þ 3f ee ei ee ei þ 2ee f ei eeð Þ ð3Þ where eeff, ee and ei are the dielectric constant of the mixture, the environment, and…”
- First-principles homogenization theory for periodic metamaterials (2010, methodology): “These generalize the Clausius-Mosotti homogenization formulas [6]-[7],[23] by rigorously taking into account the coupling among the inclusions and their polarization properties.”
- Light Scattering by a Dielectric Sphere: Perspectives on the Mie Resonances (2018, background): “The proportionality constant of the dipolar scattering amplitude, B0, is commonly recognized as the normalized polarizability of the inclusion [64], viz.”
- Effective medium theory for dispersions of dielectric ellipsoids (2003, background): “In current literature Maxwell’s relation for spheres and Fricke’s expressions for ellipsoids are the so-called Maxwell–Garnett Effective Medium Theory results [6,7]: both theories hold on under the hypothesis of the very low concentration of the dispersed component.”
- Frequency dependence of the complex permittivity and its impact on dielectric sensor calibration in soils (2005, background): “Network analyzers measure the reflection cially at low frequencies (Sihvola, 1999).”