Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions

By R. Clarkson, Kathryn Deyes. 2001

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/862e7d2617ced6c8d862e097dcd0e1cb967c17c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Is it possible to increase the sustainability of arable and ruminant agriculture by reducing inputs (2009, background): “A large variation can be seen in the published values of251 GHG emissions and burdens (Table 1, Hartridge and Pearce 2001; Pretty et al. 2005a;252 Clarkson and Deyes, 2002; Atkinson et al. 2004).”
The social cost of carbon in U.S. regulatory impact analyses: an introduction and critique (2012, methodology): “1997), including by Great Britain (Clarkson and Deyes 2002), Germany (Umweltbundesamt 2007), and the European Commission.”
The Social Cost of Carbon and its Policy Implications (2003, methodology): “From unweighted social cost estimates to weighted cost estimates Clarkson and Deyes (2002) suggest that equity weighting with = 1 roughly doubles the unweighted estimates.”
A Review of the Stern Review (2006, result): “Instead, it calls for the same target for stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations as the previous estimate of HM Treasury (Clarkson and Deyes, 2002) 12 even though it reports a marginal damage cost estimate that is three times as high.”
The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes (2008, unknown): “Clarkson & Deyes 2002 1.000 101.5 0 0 1 0 1 3.0 1.0 1 Tol 2002 0.083 19.9 0 1 1 1 1 2.0 0.0 0”
Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty (2006, background): “For instance, even though the UK Green Book discounting scheme raises the value of SCC by 170%, the resulting SCC estimate of $18/tC ($22/tC in 2005 prices) is still much smaller than the £70/tC ($116/tC in 2005 prices) recommended by Clarkson and Deyes (2002).”
Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators (2008, background): “Losses due to the depletion of resources such as oil: Weitzman (1999) Damage related to carbon emissions Social cost of carbon emissions: Clarkson and Deyes (2002) Optimal carbon price: Nordhaus (2006)”
The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: A Comment (2006, unknown): “Earlier, HM Treasury had released a report (Clarkson and Deyes, 2002) that justified the 550 ppm CO 2eq target.”
The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern (2006, background): “Clarkson & Deyes (2002) recommended a range from £35 to £140 per tonne of carbon, with a central value of £70, based largely on the Eyre et al. (1999) ExternE study.”