Procedures to estimate fecundity of marine fish species in relation to their reproductive strategy

By H. Murua, G. Kraus, Francisco Saborido-Rey, P. Witthames, A. Thorsen, S. Junquera. 2003

482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86233e9d95216d4e5c1d338b514caf6d9924f0f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Why Should We Closely Monitor Fecundity in Marine Fish Populations (2008, methodology): “In most studies, fecundity usually refers to potential annual fecundity, which represents the total number of advanced yolked oocytes matured per female and year, uncorrected for atretic losses (Murua et al., 2003).”
A Standardized Terminology for Describing Reproductive Development in Fishes (2011, unknown): “An additional source of confusion in the literature has been the use of the term “mature” or “maturation” to describe (1) the initial, one-time attainment of sexual maturity (Rideout et al. 2005); (2) a ﬁsh of any age that has already reached sexual maturity (Hilge 1977; Hunter et al. 1992; ICES 200”
Systematic bias in estimates of reproductive potential of an Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) stock: implications for stock–recruit theory and management (2006, methodology): “Improved methods for measuring the fecundity of wild stocks have been developed (Murua et al. 2003) and in the future should encourage the acquisition of new data on this key life history parameter.”
Advances in methods for determining fecundity: application of the new methods to some marine fishes (2009, background): “Recent work has shown that not all the fecundity develops into eggs (realized fecundity) and follicular atresia may account for a substantial part of the fecundity in a process referred to as down regulation (see reviews Murua et al., 2003; Thorsen et al., 2006; Kjesbu and Witthames, 2007).”
Energy acquisition and allocation to egg production in relation to fish reproductive strategies (2014, background): “Although estimating fecundity can be relatively straightforward for some species and there is a long history of such measurements (Hickling 1940; Vladykov and Legendre 1940; Crim and Glebe 1990), for other species it can be quite difficult (Murua et al. 2003), and for still others the basic biology ”
Histological analysis invalidates macroscopically determined maturity ogives of the Kattegat cod (Gadus morhua) and suggests new proxies for estimating maturity status of individual fish (2006, background): “The use of histology in maturity studies has become more and more widespread as it is has become more consistent and reliable (Kjesbu et al., 2003; Murua et al., 2003; Tomkiewicz et al., 2003).”
Review of size- and age-dependence in batch spawning : implications for stock assessment of fish species exhibiting indeterminate fecundity (2012, background): “Therefore, multiple criteria are recommended for defining fecundity type (Murua and Saborido-Rey, 2003; Lowerre-Barbieri et al., 2011b) and, accordingly, some corrections have been made to previous classifications (Arocha, 2002).”
Comparison of various potential fecundity models for north-east Arctic cod Gadus morhua, L. using oocyte diameter as a standardizing factor (2006, background): “FP is usually regarded as the number of maturing oocytes present in the prespawning ovary whilst ‘realized’ fecundity is the number of eggs that are actually spawned (Murua et al., 2003).”