School bullying: development and some important challenges.
By D. Olweus. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2013
1,241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Plant Science, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85e4f4000b04883659398866076874550df8e1f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- J. M. Machimbarrena
- Jacek Pyzalski
- Gary W. Giumetti
- Amber N. Schroeder
- Robin M. Kowalski
- Nick Haslam
- Micah R. Lattanner
- Peter K. Smith
In Plant Science
- Jacek Pyzalski
- Robin M. Kowalski
- J. M. Machimbarrena
- Gary W. Giumetti
- Amber N. Schroeder
- Nick Haslam
- Micah R. Lattanner
- Peter K. Smith
In Social Psychology
- Robin M. Kowalski
- Jacek Pyzalski
- Maite Garaigordobil
- Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
- Gary W. Giumetti
- Amber N. Schroeder
- Micah R. Lattanner
- Anthony A. Volk
Citations in the corpus
- Victimization and Perpetration of Bullying/Cyberbullying: Connections with Emotional and Behavioral Problems and Childhood Stress (2019, background): “imbalance between victim and aggressor (Olweus, 2013), and”
- Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, methodology): “As with traditional bullying, the power imbalance with cyberbullying can take any of a number of forms: physical, social, relational, or psychological (Dooley, Pyżalski, & Cross, 2009; Monks & Smith, 2006; Olweus, 2013; Pyzalski, 2011).”
- Detection of Cyberbullying Incidents on the Instagram Social Network (2015, background): “…can take on a variety of forms including physical, social, relational or psychological (Doo-ley, Py ˙ zalski, and Cross 2009; Monks and Smith 2006; Olweus 2013; Py˙zalski 2010), such as a user being more technologically savvy than another (Kowalski et al. 2014), a group of users targeting one…”
- Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (2015, background): “…cyber-aggression (Calvete, Orue, Estévez, Villardón, & Padilla, 2010) or with cyber-victimization (Müller, Pfetsch, & Ittel, 2014), leaving out the dynamic existing between the roles and how the criteria of intentionality, repetition and imbalance of powers takes place between them (Olweus, 2013).”
- Social interactions in daily life (2018, background): “Various subdisciplines within psychology, along with other fields including sociology and human development and family studies, examine myriad such phenomena, including prejudice, discrimination, and stigma (Devine, 1989; Goffman, 2009; Quillian, 2006); close relationships (Hofmann, Finkel, & Fitzsi”
- Concept Creep: Psychology's Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology (2016, background): “As Olweus (2013) has observed, citations of bullying research increased 100-fold from 1990 to 2010.”
- Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys (2019, neutral): “Aim 4: we used data from HBSC (2013/2014) and EUKO to examine whether M:F ratio varies between offline and online types of bullying.”
- What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “This is a problem because there is evidence that single incidents of bullying can be harmful (Olweus, 2013).”
- Comparing children's experiences of schools-based bullying across countries (2017, background): “Defining bullying Olweus (2013), one of the pioneers of research in this field, defines bullying as having three key characteristics – intentionality (that is the perpetrator(s) of the bullying intend or aim to inflict harm); some repetitiveness (in most cases an isolated incident would not be…”