Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions: Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions
465 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85c8b9410540d60328b702727545e904e7a2ce2c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Miguel A. Ferreira
- Pedro Matos
- P. Pires
- Song Ma
- Frederick Bereskin
- Joel Stiebale
- W. Rotenberg
- J. Beňa
In Economics and Econometrics
- Song Ma
- Miguel A. Ferreira
- Pedro Matos
- Frederick Bereskin
- Joel Stiebale
- P. Pires
- W. Rotenberg
- Thomas Keil
Citations in the corpus
- The Life Cycle of Corporate Venture Capital (2019, methodology): “TechProximity is calculated as the Cosine-similarity between the CVC’s and the startup’s vectors of patent weights across different technology classes (Jaffe, 1986; Bena and Li, 2014).”
- Are Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership (2017, methodology): “In robustness tests, we address this concern by using patent counts adjusted by the average number of patents in each technological class and time period (Bena and Li (2014)).”
- The Effect of Cultural Similarity on Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, unknown): “Following previous studies (e.g., Deng, Kang, and Low, 2013; Bena and Li, 2014), we restrict our main sample to completed mergers involving U.S. acquirers and targets where the acquirer owns less than 50% of the target 19 Of the domestic mergers mentioned in our paper, AT&T-SBC, Chevron-Unocal, and…”
- Cash Holdings, Competition, and Innovation (2016, unknown): “To measure how close two firms’ R&D activities are and how intense the competition between them is expected to be, we follow Bena and Li (2014) and adopt a measure of innovation proximity based on Jaffe (1986).”
- Corporate Innovation Along the Supply Chain (2018, unknown): “…(Acharya et al. 2013, 2014,Bradley et al. 2017), stock liquidity (Fang et al. 2014), banking competition (Cornaggia et al. 2015), firm boundaries (Bena and Li 2014, Seru 2014), management compensation (Baranchuk et al. 2014), financial development (Hsu et al. 2014), governance (Chemmanur and…”
- Cross-Border M&As and Innovative Activity of Acquiring and Target Firms (2016, background): “See Blonigen (2005), Greenaway and Kneller (2007) or Helpman (2006) for an overview of the determinants of FDI in general. acquisition targets (Nocke and Yeaple, 2008; Norbäck and Persson, 2007).”
- The Pre-Deal Phase of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “This research has shown that firms with strong patent portfolios (Bena & Li, 2014; Ransbotham & Mitra, 2010), other resources and capabilities related to research and development (R&D) (Heeley, King, & Covin, 2006; Ruckman, 2005), slack (Davis & Stout, 1992), and environmental capabilities…”
- Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions? (2017, unknown): “It is important to understand which factors contribute to the ebb and flow of M&As because such activities cultivate innovation (Phillips and Zhdanov, 2013; Bena and Li, 2014) and synergies (Betton, Eckbo, and Thorburn, 2008; Sheen, 2014; Devos, Kadapakkam, and Krishnamurthy, 2009; Wang and Xie, 200”
- Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions (2019, unknown): “Next, Bena and Li (2014) consider relatedness in terms of technological overlap.”
- Human capital relatedness and mergers and acquisitions (2018, unknown): “Bena and Li (2014) show that technology overlap can create synergy in mergers and improve postmerger innovation activity.”
- The Real Effects of Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Innovation (2018, background): “We begin by presenting the average level of patent output, including both the number of patents (Unscaled Counts) and the number of 16 See Sevilir and Tian (2012) and Bena and Li (2014) for discussions of acquiring innovation.”