Prospective cognitions in anxiety and depression: Replication and methodological extension

By J. Stöber. 2000

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85a6d55781e7c44113152d3282121a877e46fdcd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Elizabeth S. Paul
2. M. Mendl
3. Reinhard Pekrun
4. Oliver Burman
5. Thomas Goetz
6. Nathan C. Hall
7. R. Perry

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Elizabeth S. Paul
2. M. Mendl
3. Reinhard Pekrun
4. Oliver Burman
5. Thomas Goetz
6. A. Frenzel
7. Nathan C. Hall
8. Kou Murayama

Citations in the corpus

• An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood (2010, background): “B (2010) (state) anxiety (Q4) judge ambiguous stimuli as more likely to be negative, while people in states of sadness or depression (Q3) judge them as less likely to be positive in line with predictions outlined above (e.g. MacLeod et al. 1997; Stober 2000; MacLeod & Salaminiou 2001).”
• Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms (2009, background): “expect (and recall) positive events, while anxiety is associated with an increased anticipation (and recall) of negative events, although both states often co-occur in individuals (MacLeod et al., 1997; Mineka et al., 1998; Stober, 2000;MacLeod and Salaminiou, 2001;Miranda and Mennin, 2007).”
• The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice (2006, background): “Miller & Abramson, 1980; see also Stober, 2000 ).”