Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences.

By J. Campbell, A. Jones, J. Dienemann, J. Kub, Janet Schollenberger, P. O’Campo, A. Gielen, Clifford Wynne. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2002

1,137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/859fc89ce0d608a32c70582427878924cf294251

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Hannah Carton
2. L. Heise
3. Roberta E. Gealt
4. C. Garcia-Moreno
5. L. Goodman
6. Ma
7. L. Marácz
8. Mary Ann Dutton

In Demography

1. Roberta E. Gealt
2. L. Marácz
3. D. Button
4. F. Grin
5. N. Pokorn
6. Rachel Heath

In Health

1. L. Heise
2. C. Watts
3. Matt R. Nobles
4. K. Fox
5. Roberta E. Gealt
6. Hannah Carton
7. C. Garcia-Moreno
8. L. Goodman

Citations in the corpus

• Chapter 1. General introduction (2015, background): “During the last decades however, perioperative outcome after hepatic resection has improved, due to increased knowledge of liver anatomy and function, improvement of operating techniques and advances in anaesthesia and postop‐ erative care [1, 3, 4].”
• Testing the cycle of violence hypothesis: child abuse and adolescent dating violence as predictors of intimate partner violence in young adulthood (2011, background): “…transmitted infections, unintended pregnancy, decreased condom negotiation skills, greater number of lifetime sex partners and poor mental health (Campbell et al., 2002; Coker et al., 2002; Goodwin, Gazmararian, Johnson, Gilbert, & Saltzman, 2000; Hathaway et al., 2000; Plichta & Falik, 2001;…”
• Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization (2005, background): “In addition to the physical injury that results from IPV, research has demonstrated a significant relationship between IPV and poor health outcomes, including self-reported health status, somatic symptoms, risk of illness, and exacerbated medical conditions (Campbell et al., 2002; Campbell, 2002; Ca”
• Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: Review and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice (2009, background): “Partners of batterers are at risk for a range of negative consequences that go beyond immediate physical injuries to include a variety of stress-related psychiatric disorders (Campbell et al., 2002; Eisenstat & Bancroft, 1999).”
• The dark triad and intimate partner violence (2017, methodology): “Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate /pa id elements of the behaviour (Campbell, 2002; Campbell et al., 2002; Abramsky et al., 2011).”
• Interventions for Violence Against Women (2006, background): “Physical health consequences include a 50% to 70% increase in gynecological, central nervous system, and stress-related problems.(8,15) Impairment in mental and emotional health is associated with exposure to IPV, including depression, anxiety, suicidality, posttraumatic stress disorder, mood and ea”
• What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence (2011, background): “In addition to being a concern in its own right, IPV is associated with a range of adverse physical, mental, sexual and reproductive health outcomes [2-8].”
• High Risk Behaviors Among Victims of Sibling Violence (2010, background): “Although age, gender (Piquero and Mazerolle 2001), and other forms of family violence (Fischbach and Herbert 1997; Glaser 2005; Mullen et al. 1996; Payne 2002; Plichta 2004; Zlotnick et al. 2006) are common predictors of substance use, delinquency, and violence, our data show that sibling abuse sign”
• Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory (2011, background): “Furthermore, exposure to IPV produces negative effects for victims that are similar to stalking victimization, such as anxiety, depression, headaches, loss of appetite, and stomach ulcers (Campbell et al., 2002; Coker et al., 2000).”
• Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial Validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale (2008, background): “In addition, battered women report higher rates of general health problems ( Campbell et al, 2002 ).”