Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization

By Mary Ann Dutton, L. Goodman. 2005

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1667094617017f151a6e667062013cbf2424ba1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Manisha Joshi
2. J. McGarry
3. Kimberly A. Crossman
4. Jac Brown
5. P. Ali
6. A. Ford
7. K. Thomas
8. Maureen C McHugh

In Health

1. Manisha Joshi
2. J. McGarry
3. Kimberly A. Crossman
4. Jac Brown
5. P. Ali
6. A. Ford
7. K. Thomas
8. Maureen C McHugh

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Manisha Joshi
2. J. McGarry
3. Kimberly A. Crossman
4. Jac Brown
5. P. Ali
6. A. Ford
7. K. Thomas
8. Maureen C McHugh

Citations in the corpus

• THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, background): “Funded-research is currently testing measures of coercion that may alter the implication of mutual combat, and confirm a different dynamic in that category (Cook & Goodman, 2006; Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012, unknown): “Similarly, Ehrensaft et al. (2003), after controlling for demographic factors and other predictors, found that exposure to violence between parents was a risk factor but not as strong a predictor as conduct disorder.”
• “Do You Know What It Feels Like to Drown?” (2014, methodology): “Economic, political, cultural, familial, social, and individual factors give meaning to an abuser’s coercive behavior such that what is coercive to one person may be not be to another (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• Young People’s Online and Face-to-Face Experiences of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse and Their Subjective Impact Across Five European Countries (2017, background): “Abusers, through the use of “surveillance and behavioral regulation,” ensure that their victims remain aware of their control even when they are not physically present (p. 209), ensuring compliance (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications (2016, background): “…current focus of research, and it’s only recently that researchers have started acknowledging that instead of treating coercive control as a separate variable it is important to explore and understand contextual, interdependent and interactive nature of coercive control (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• Do Violent Acts Equal Abuse? Resolving the Gender Parity/Asymmetry Dilemma (2010, background): “Despite attempts to broaden the definition of domestic violence to include “ psychological abuse ” or “ control ” (Saltzman 2000; DeKeseredy 2000; Dutton and Goodman 2005), criminal and family law, medical identification protocols, and other major intervention strategies or policies continue to focu”
• Early exposure to violence, domestic violence, attachment representations, and marital adjustment (2009, unknown): “For example, Stark (2007) and Dutton and Goodman (2005) argued that we should stop using physical abuse as a proxy for battering and that coercive control (such as derogating, demeaning, or self-concept destructive behaviors) has more serious effects than verbal yelling or fighting.”
• Placing Coercive Control at the Center: What Are the Processes of Coercive Control and What Makes Control Coercive? (2017, background): “Finally, IPV assessments in health care, legal, and other practice settings focus primarily on acts of violence, excluding elements of coercion (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• A Postmodern Approach to Women's Use of Violence: Developing Multiple and Complex Conceptualizations (2005, background): “For example, Dutton and Goodman (2005) find fault with current scales of psychological abuse and abusive acts that fail to consider the ability to control the partner.”
• Intimate Femicide: The Role of Coercive Control (2019, background): “In other words, the credibility of the threat must be understood in the context of the price of non-compliance (Dutton & Goodman, 2005).”
• Coercive Control in Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence (2013, background): “…with physical aggression higher among respondents engaging in SCV than IT, perhaps suggesting that physical violence need not be frequent when one partner has established a high degree of control over the other, as would be the case in IT (Dutton and Goodman 2005; Stark 2007; Umberson et al. 1998).”