Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology

By Ashish Arora, Alfonso Gambardella. 2010

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/859088cf78c8b62e98064f2df9705683fddf8f86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices (2014, background): “Intellectual property right has often been mentioned in the literature as a key enabler of openness, as it increases the tradability of knowledge, offsetting some of the limitations of markets for technology (Arora and Gambardella, 2010).”
Integrating Insights From the Resource-Based View of the Firm Into the New Stakeholder Theory (2021, background): “The organizations that drive intermediary scientific accomplishments often must cede control to other organizations for progress to occur (Arora & Gambardella, 1990, 1994, 2010).”
Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge (2017, positive): “Attempts to access external knowledge among organizations of all sizes have increased substantially in the last two decades (Arora and Gambardella, 2010; Hagedoorn, 2002; Kale and Singh, 2009), and this more ‘open’ approach to innovation has become increasingly important to overall innovation strate”
Knowledge-Based Capital, Innovation and Resource Allocation (2013, background): “Partly because of this, facilitating transactions in the market for patents is difficult and the market is subject to significant transaction costs (Gambardella, 2008; Eisenberg and Ziedonis, 2010).”
Used, Blocking and Sleeping Patents: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Inventor Survey (2016, background): “Moreover, since we dropped pplications that had been withdrawn or rejected, patents for which the applicant tops paying fees are not taken into account. exhibits a larger share of patents licensed (10.5% in the U.S. vs. 6.4% in Europe vs. 3.5% in Japan) and sold (7.6% in the U.S. vs. 4.2% in Europe ”