The Role of Rapport in Investigative Interviewing: A Review

By A. Abbe, S. Brandon. 2013

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/853abb2e2f7c647ef3d2483e1ce158a736f1b3af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Aldert Vrij
2. Lorraine Hope
3. R. Fisher

In Social Psychology

1. R. Fisher
2. Aldert Vrij
3. Lorraine Hope
4. Maria Hartwig
5. S. Porter
6. Leanne ten Brinke
7. Pär Anders Granhag
8. Leif A. Strömwall

Citations in the corpus

• Eliciting Reliable Information in Investigative Interviews (2014, background): “Positivity refers to friendliness and caring, but also to liking (warmth) and respecting competence (Abbe & Brandon, 2012).”
• Exploring the use of rapport in professional information‐gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base (2020, unknown): “…these behaviors signal attention and engagement, then an interviewee will likely be encouraged to continue the interaction; if not, interactions can break down and the amount of information disclosed by the interviewee is reduced (Abbe & Brandon, 2013; Holmberg & Madsen, 2014; Walsh & Bull, 2012).”