Testing Complex Correlational Hypotheses With Structural Equation Models

By Kristopher J Preacher. 2006

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84f6cb69f0f1f6c5b7123f2ec0f2f220e2bfaed3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Nicholas S. Holtzman
2. C. Kam
3. John P. Meyer
4. Michael Strube

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nicholas S. Holtzman
2. C. Kam
3. John P. Meyer
4. Michael Strube

In Statistics and Probability

1. Nicholas S. Holtzman
2. C. Kam
3. John P. Meyer
4. Michael Strube

Citations in the corpus

• People With Dark Personalities Tend to Create a Physically Attractive Veneer (2013, methodology): “To establish the comparability of the models for men and women, who were rated by different groups, we used Preacher’s (2006) approach that allows for constraining semipartial effects to equality across groups (in our case, participant sex).”
• How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality (2015, methodology): “Following Preacher (2006), we first constructed a multigroup CFA model and allowed comparable correlations for careless and careful respondents to be freely estimated in the first model and then constrained correlations to be identical in the second model.”