Input–output analysis of energy use in agriculture

By O. Karkacıer, Z. G. Goktolga. 2005

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84f54b0cf0f1f5826eb9cd5868ce7fa8be40822e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. D. Guan
2. Klaus Hubacek
3. Kuishuang Feng
4. Manfred Lenzen
5. Richard Wood
6. T. Wiedmann
7. G. P. Peters
8. Edgar G. Hertwich

In Strategy and Management

1. Richard Wood
2. D. Guan
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. Klaus Hubacek
5. Yang Yu
6. Kuishuang Feng
7. T. Wiedmann
8. G. P. Peters

Citations in the corpus

• A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia (2006, background): “…flows by Zucchetto and Bickle (1984), to energy required for US agriculture by Cleveland (1995), to Swiss agriculture by Kytzia et al. (2004), to Swedish agriculture by Uhlin (1998), and to energy in Turkish agriculture by Ozkan et al. (2004a,b) and Karkacier and Goktolga (2005), for example.”
• Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK (2010, methodology): “Simple Location Quotients (SLQ) The rationale for using LQ is examined in Richardson (1972), Mayer and Pleeter (1975), Round (1983) and Miller and Blair (1985).”