Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing
By W. Sandler, D. Lillo-Martin. 2006
738 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84b221a76062624a345f2caaef41edc7d81c5d18
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Gabriella Vigliocco
- Nicholas Evans
- David P. Vinson
- Christian Vogler
- Pamela Perniss
- Naomi K. Caselli
- Bencie Woll
- Robin L. Thompson
In Language and Linguistics
- Nicholas Evans
- Stephen C. Levinson
- Meredith Ringel Morris
- Bencie Woll
- Kearsy Cormier
- Oscar Koller
- A. Schembri
- Paula Rubio-Fernández
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. (2009, background): “However, sonority-based restrictions have been documented in sign languages (Corina 1990; Sandler & Lillo-Martin 2006), and recent experimental work suggests that they are active in the brains of individual speakers even when the relevant structures are absent in their language.”
- Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages (2010, background): “ICONICITY IN SIGNED LANGUAGE Signed languages, produced and perceived in the visual-spatial modality, obey the same grammatical constraints and linguistic principles found in spoken languages (for reviews, see Emmorey, 2002; Sandler and Lillo-Martin, 2006).”
- The Form of Children's Early Signs: Iconic or Motoric Determinants? (2008, background): “15For recent discussions of the notion of a sign syllable, see Brentari (1998) and Sandler and Lillo-Martin (2006).”
- Pronouns and pointing in sign languages (2013, background): “Various theoretical frameworks were applied to sign languages, most of them within the generative tradition2 (see Sandler and Lillo-Martin, 2006 for an overview); this approach also resulted in borrowing a considerable amount of linguistic terminology from spoken language studies.”
- Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (2019, background): “More recent analyses of sign languages offer more sophisticated and detailed phonological analyses [17, 114, 96, 20].”
- Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution (2014, background): “Signed language necessarily occurs in contexts of face-to-face communication and involves the use of the hands as major articulators in addition to multiple other non-manual channels of expression (face, mouth, eyebrows and body) [12–15].”
- Ensuring language acquisition for deaf children: What linguists can do (2014, background): “…as well as more recently in journals that do not focus on sign languages, such as Language; and see a variety of comprehensive books, such as Sandler & Lillo-Martin 2006, Brentari 2010, Pfau et al. 2012), on language acquisition (Newport & Meier 1985, Meier & Newport 1990, Petitto &…”